
Rating: Not rated 
Tags: Physics, Lang:en 
Summary
 Einstein said that the most incomprehensible thing about
      the universe is that it is comprehensible. But was he
      right? Can the quantum theory of fields and Einstein's general
      theory of relativity, the two most accurate and successful
      theories in all of physics, be united in a single quantum
      theory of gravity? Can quantum and cosmos ever be
      combined? On this issue, two of the world's most famous physicists -
      Stephen Hawking (A Brief History of Time) and Roger Penrose
      (The Emperor's New Mind and Shadows of the Mind) - disagree.
      Here they explain their positions in a work based on six
      lectures with a final debate, all originally presented at the
      Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences at the
      University of Cambridge. How could quantum gravity, a theory that could explain the
      earlier moments of the big bang and the physics of the
      enigmatic objects known as black holes, be constructed? Why
      does our patch of the universe look just as Einstein
      predicted, with no hint of quantum effects in sight? What
      strange quantum processes can cause black holes to evaporate,
      and what happens to all the information that they swallow?
      Why does time go forward, not backward? In this book, the two opponents touch on all these
      questions. Penrose, like Einstein, refuses to believe that
      quantum mechanics is a final theory. Hawking thinks
      otherwise, and argues that general relativity simply cannot
      account for how the universe began. Only a quantum theory of
      gravity, coupled with the no-boundary hypothesis, can ever
      hope to explain adequately what little we can observe about
      our universe. Penrose, playing the realist to Hawking's
      positivist, thinks that the universe is unbounded and will
      expand forever. The universe can be understood, he argues, in
      terms of the geometry of light cones, the compression and
      distortion of spacetime, and by the use of twistor theory.
      With the final debate, the reader will come to realize how
      much Hawking and Penrose diverge in their opinions of the
      ultimate quest to combine quantum mechanics and relativity,
      and how differently they have tried to comprehend the
      incomprehensible. In a new afterword, the authors outline how recent
      developments have caused their positions to further diverge
      on a number of key issues, including the spatial geometry of
      the universe, inflationary versus cyclic theories of the
      cosmos, and the black-hole information-loss paradox. Though
      much progress has been made, Hawking and Penrose stress that
      physicists still have much farther to go in their quest for a
      quantum theory of gravity.